Author name: Editor

With the increasing financialization of our everyday lives, land financialization has been a pressing concern for critical geographers and urbanists alike. Typically, studies on the phenomenon take a grand view, focusing, for example, on the role of global capital flows, or treating financialization as a ‘new’ regime of accumulation. But the more practical implications of […]

German sociologist and philosopher Oskar Negt, who died in the spring of 2024 at the age of 89, was a scholar and public intellectual working broadly in the tradition of the Frankfurt School. He studied at the University of Frankfurt and from 1970 to his retirement in 2002, he held the chair as professor of

In Education for Political Life: Critique, Theory, and Practice in Karl Mannheim’s Sociology of Knowledge, Iaan Reynolds reintroduces Karl Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge, a complex social theory and phenomenological method of inquiry, to twenty-first-century readers anew as a form of political philosophy. Against the common characterization of Mannheim as an eccentric sociologist, advanced by Mannheim’s many

Joan Braune’s Understanding and Countering Fascist Movements combines philosophical and activist vantage points in its commentary on fascism and far right radicalisation, offering unique insights for the present moment. Braune showcases an unusual capacity to weave themes anchored in social critique with philosophical reflection alongside an incisive understanding of oppression and how it reproduces itself in society.

Lachlan Dale considers a naturalistic view of Buddhism. Robert Wright’s book, Why Buddhism Is True: The Science And Philosophy Of Meditation And Enlightenment (2017) is part of the ‘Secular Buddhist’ movement – a project which seeks to strip away the religion’s metaphysical and mystical content and ground it in a naturalistic or science-based interpretation. In

We seek purpose and enlightenment as Stephen Anderson attempts to understand Raymond Tallis’s attempt to understand our understanding of the world. We are sometimes slow to recognize any downside to our modern age’s mad enthusiasm for scientific achievement, technological advancement, globalization, bureaucratic rationalization and the proliferation of information. But philosophers have highlighted the paradox of

Melissa Merritt considers the logic of Immanuel Kant. It is well known that Immanuel Kant wrote the Critique of Pure Reason to establish metaphysics as a science. At the outset of the Critique, Kant considers what this effort might learn from successful examples of scientific inquiry – mentioning logic first of all, which he claims

Richard Baron wonders what changes in our own thinking it would take to live with sociable robots. The robots are coming. Many are already here. They perform surgery, assemble cars, fetch and carry in warehouses, and clean floors. These robots are simply tools which do the jobs we give them, even when they use a

Melissa Merritt considers the logic of Immanuel Kant. It is well known that Immanuel Kant wrote the Critique of Pure Reason to establish metaphysics as a science. At the outset of the Critique, Kant considers what this effort might learn from successful examples of scientific inquiry – mentioning logic first of all, which he claims

Richard Baron wonders what changes in our own thinking it would take to live with sociable robots. The robots are coming. Many are already here. They perform surgery, assemble cars, fetch and carry in warehouses, and clean floors. These robots are simply tools which do the jobs we give them, even when they use a